Bake Off star Prue Leith objects to prep faculty’s plan for a hockey pitch and enjoying area close to her Cotswolds dwelling arguing it might be ‘an absolute crime’ to ‘destroy’ the realm
- Prue Leith objected to highschool’s plan to put in a hockey pitch and enjoying area
- Star raised considerations relating to the heritage of the positioning and its impact on locals
- Proposal for taking part in area submitted by Kitebrook Preparatory Faculty this yr
(operate (src, d, tag)
var s = d.createElement(tag), prev = d.getElementsByTagName(tag);
s.src = src;
(“https://www.dailymail.co.uk/static/gunther/1.17.zero/async_bundle–.js”, doc, “script”));
Bake Off’s Prue Leith has objected to a college’s plan to put in a hockey pitch and enjoying area within the space and argued the proposed web site can be ‘destroyed’ if planning is granted.
The TV choose, 81, has penned a second objection to the plans for a hockey pitch with 49ft-high floodlights at Kitebrook Preparatory Faculty, in Moreton-in-Marsh, Gloucestershire, which sits a stone’s throw away from her Cotswolds dwelling.
She has raised considerations relating to the heritage of the positioning and is making an attempt to dam the proposals which the college say will ‘enhance grassroots sport improvement’.
The Bake Off star initially wrote an objection to the proposals in June however since then the proposals have continued to draw vital responses on the West Oxfordshire District Council (WODC) planning portal.
Bake Off star Prue Leith (pictured along with her husband John Playfair at their dwelling) has objected to Kitebrook Preparatory Faculty’s plan to construct a hockey pitch and enjoying area within the space
The varsity has proposed constructing each a hockey pitch and enjoying filed that can have 49ft-high floodlights
In her second objection remark, Ms Leith stated: ‘I’ve since found that the proposed web site is an historic ridge and furrow area which might be destroyed if planning is granted.
‘We’re extraordinarily fortunate to be one of many few locations in England with wonderful ridge and furrow fields courting from medieval instances.
‘It might be not only a crying disgrace, however an absolute crime to destroy a patch of ridge and furrow, not to mention an enormous area.
‘I reside a couple of quarter of a mile from the proposed enjoying fields and, although I perceive the necessity for sports activities amenities for youngsters, I feel, despite the alterations to the unique plan, that the proposed improvement is far too massive.’
Ms Leith stated the ‘most vital drawback’ can be the ‘runoff of rainwater’.
She added that her land already suffered from frequent flooding and that it ‘can not take any extra water’.
Ms Leith’s remark added: ‘Grass pitches wouldn’t be an issue, or synthetic grass laid on free draining subsoil, however an all-weather floor of such dimensions is unreasonable.
Kitebrook Preparatory Faculty (pictured), in Moreton-in-Marsh, says the hockey pitch and enjoying fields will ‘enhance grassroots sport improvement’
In her second objection remark, Ms Leith stated the proposed web site, an historic ridge and furrow area, might be ‘destroyed’ if the plans go forward
‘Subsequent, why does the college want a number of massive pitches? Prep faculty kids can not play on full measurement pitches.’
‘One of many joys of residing in a rural setting is the darkish evening skies so I used to be happy to see that the proposed stadium lights are to not be.
‘However is there something to cease the college including the lights at a later date? Who would police that?’
Since Ms Leith’s unique objection remark, Evenlode Parish Council has additionally objected in a consultee remark.
The council’s remark learn: ‘The proposals could have an hostile affect on this village by way of flooding from the runoff which a man-made panorama will generate.
‘The proposals don’t show any wider profit to the actual rural economic system within the neighborhood.’
Tara Hayek, WODC’s senior conservation and design officer, had no objection in her consultee remark.
The remark learn: ‘The scheme, together with design, supplies and many others are acceptable and the applicant has thought of the present panorama character and setting of the heritage property, working with the prevailing terrain and contours to make sure that views and settings are preserved in order that the ability blends into its surrounds.’