Tag: attacks
A Famous Climate Scientist Is In Court With Big Stakes For Attacks On Science
The attacks came from groups that reject climate science, some funded by the fossil fuel industry. In the midst of these types of attacks — including the hacking of Mann’s and other scientists’ emails by unknown hackers — Penn State, where Mann was then working, opened an investigation into his research. Penn State, as well as the National Science Foundation, found no evidence of scientific misconduct. But a policy analyst and an author wrote that they were not convinced. The trial in D.C. Superior Court involves posts from right-wing author Mark Steyn and policy analyst Rand Simberg. In an online post, Simberg compared Mann to former Penn State football coach Jerry Sandusky, a convicted child sex abuser. Simberg wrote that Mann was the “Sandusky of climate science,” writing that Mann “molested and tortured data (PDF).” Steyn called Mann’s research fraudulent. Mann sued the two men for defamation. Mann also sued the publishers of the posts, National Review and the Competitive Enterprise Institute, but in 2021, the court ruled they couldn’t be held liable.
In court, Mann has argued that he lost funding and research opportunities. Steyn said in court that if Penn State’s president, Graham Spanier, covered up child sexual assault, why wouldn’t he cover up for Mann’s science. The science in question used ice cores and tree rings to estimate Earth’s past temperatures. “If Graham Spanier is prepared to cover up child rape, week in, week out, year in, year out, why would he be the least bit squeamish about covering up a bit of hanky panky with the tree rings and the ice cores?” Steyn asked the court. Mann and Steyn declined to speak to NPR during the ongoing trial. One of Simberg’s lawyers, Victoria Weatherford, said “inflammatory does not equal defamatory” and that her client is allowed to express his opinion, even if it were wrong. “No matter how offensive or distasteful or heated it is,” Weatherford tells NPR, “that speech is absolutely protected under the First Amendment when it’s said against a public figure, if the person saying it believed that what they said was true.”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
A Famous Climate Scientist Is In Court With Big Stakes For Attacks On Science
The attacks came from groups that reject climate science, some funded by the fossil fuel industry. In the midst of these types of attacks — including the hacking of Mann’s and other scientists’ emails by unknown hackers — Penn State, where Mann was then working, opened an investigation into his research. Penn State, as well as the National Science Foundation, found no evidence of scientific misconduct. But a policy analyst and an author wrote that they were not convinced. The trial in D.C. Superior Court involves posts from right-wing author Mark Steyn and policy analyst Rand Simberg. In an online post, Simberg compared Mann to former Penn State football coach Jerry Sandusky, a convicted child sex abuser. Simberg wrote that Mann was the “Sandusky of climate science,” writing that Mann “molested and tortured data (PDF).” Steyn called Mann’s research fraudulent. Mann sued the two men for defamation. Mann also sued the publishers of the posts, National Review and the Competitive Enterprise Institute, but in 2021, the court ruled they couldn’t be held liable.
In court, Mann has argued that he lost funding and research opportunities. Steyn said in court that if Penn State’s president, Graham Spanier, covered up child sexual assault, why wouldn’t he cover up for Mann’s science. The science in question used ice cores and tree rings to estimate Earth’s past temperatures. “If Graham Spanier is prepared to cover up child rape, week in, week out, year in, year out, why would he be the least bit squeamish about covering up a bit of hanky panky with the tree rings and the ice cores?” Steyn asked the court. Mann and Steyn declined to speak to NPR during the ongoing trial. One of Simberg’s lawyers, Victoria Weatherford, said “inflammatory does not equal defamatory” and that her client is allowed to express his opinion, even if it were wrong. “No matter how offensive or distasteful or heated it is,” Weatherford tells NPR, “that speech is absolutely protected under the First Amendment when it’s said against a public figure, if the person saying it believed that what they said was true.”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
DOJ charges Russian hacker linked to attacks against US law enforcement agencies
The US State Department has announced a reward of up to $10 million for information that leads to the arrest of a prolific hacker. On Monday, the Department of Justice filed criminal charges against Mikhail Pavlovich Matveev, a Russian national and resident with links to the infamous Hive, LockBit and Babuk ransomware gangs. Starting as early as 2020, Matveev has allegedly targeted US law enforcement and healthcare organizations on multiple occasions.
In April 2021, for instance, he was linked to a Babuk ransomware attack that saw the computer systems of the Metropolitan Police Department in Washington DC locked out. Last May, Matveev, whose online pseudonyms include Wazawaka, Uhodiransomwar, m1x, and Boriselcin, was allegedly involved in a Hive ransomware attack that targeted a healthcare NGO in New Jersey.
Separately, the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control announced sanctions against Matveev. “Matveev has been vocal about his illegal activities. He has provided insight into his cybercrimes in media interviews, disclosed exploit code to online criminals, and stated that his illicit activities will be tolerated by local authorities provided that he remains loyal to Russia,” the Treasury said.
Of the ransomware gangs Matveev is allegedly affiliated with, LockBit is among the most active and destructive. As of late 2022, the group’s malware has infected the computer systems of at least 1,400 victims, including a Holiday Inn hotel in Turkey. According to the Justice Department, the gang’s affiliates have extracted at least $75 million in ransom payments. Security researchers recently found evidence that suggests that LockBit recently began targeting Mac computers.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/doj-charges-russian-hacker-linked-to-attacks-against-us-law-enforcement-agencies-175740601.html?src=rss
A Startup Guide To Phishing Attacks and Prevention Tips
Phishing attacks have become a widespread cyber threat that can affect both individuals and organisations. Unfortunately, startups may be particularly…
The post A Startup Guide To Phishing Attacks and Prevention Tips appeared first on TechRound.
Labour insiders fear Starmer’s past could come back to haunt him as Tories plan to ramp up attacks
3CX data breach shows organizations can’t afford to overlook software supply chain attacks
‘A child is going to lose their life’: Sickening trend of children filming attacks on other kids
‘I’ll fight politically-driven attacks on women’s health’: Biden vows to keep battling for abortion
Security researchers uncover NSO Group iPhone attacks in Europe
Earlier this week, we saw research showing the noxious NSO Group continues to spy on people’s iPhones in Mexico. Now, Jamf Threat Labs has found additional attacks against human rights activists and journalists in the Middle East and Europe, one of whom worked for a global news agency.
Older iPhones at most risk
The main thrust of the latest research is that while Apple has taken steps to protect devices running the most recent versions of iOS, these attacks are still being made against older iPhones. Jamf warns that the attacks “prove malicious threat actors will exploit any vulnerabilities in an organization’s infrastructure they can get their hands on.”