Tag: proposed
Microsoft’s proposed Activision Blizzard acquisition has been approved by EU regulators
Microsoft’s proposed buyout of Activision Blizzard just received some good news. The European Commission have today approved the $70 billion acquisition, saying that Microsoft’s commitments “represent a significant improvement for cloud gaming.” That’s a markedly different tone to the UK’s conclusion last month, as the British regulator blocked the acquisition over concerns about the cloud market’s future.
Tim Cain reveals proposed sequels to Vampire – Bloodlines: ‘We were planning a trilogy, which I forgot’
Proposed Mission Seeks to Resurrect Retired Spitzer Space Telescope
For more than three years, NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope has been idly coasting around the Sun while locked in a retirement safe mode, while its successor, the Webb Telescope, took over its cosmic observation duties. An upcoming servicing mission, however, could give the old telescope a new purpose: protecting Earth…
Brazil Proposed Internet Regulation. Big Tech Took the Gloves Off
Startup’s Proposed Satellite Swarm Would Create 3D Maps of Earth’s Entire Surface
Satellites flying overhead in Earth’s orbit largely provide a two-dimensional view of our planet, but a Florida-based company is hoping to change that by using satellites to routinely build 3D maps of Earth’s entire surface.
Hong Kong brokerage Solowin files for proposed $17M US IPO
Live Nation responds to proposed new ticketing regulations in the US
Microsoft’s proposed Activision Blizzard acquisition has been blocked by the UK
Microsoft’s proposed acquisition of Activision Blizzard King has hit a large snag on the road. The UK’s Competitions And Markets Authority (CMA) previously released their provisional findings on the $69 billion buyout, laying out concerns over less competition and innovation for UK gamers. Microsoft were allowed to respond to the CMA’s findings, but it seems they weren’t able to quell the regulator’s concerns, as the CMA have now vetoed the merger.
Rust Foundation Apologizes For Proposed Trademark Changes, Promises Improvement
The Foundation now says their proposed policy “clearly needs improvement” and “there are many valid critiques of the initial draft,” promising to address them and adopt a more transparent process (with a report summarizing the feedback soon). From the Register’s report:
The foundation, which provides financial and legal support for the memory-safe programming language, had proposed fresh rules on the use of the word Rust and its logo, which included the recommendation that people not use ‘Rust’ in their Rust crate names, eg: vulture-rs would be preferred over vulture-rust. These draft changes triggered a backlash… Over the weekend, Rust creator Graydon Hoare voiced support for the community’s objections in a Reddit discussion thread, in response to a post by programmer Andrew Gallant, a former member of the Rust moderation team, who argued the new policy was not all that different from the old one.
“Open them up side by side — old and new — and look at what they each say about, specifically, package names, project names, repos or websites using the word ‘rust’, or modified versions of the logo used for small groups or projects,” wrote Hoare. “These are specifically the things people are upset about, because they all changed from ‘acceptable’ to ‘prohibited’ when ‘clarifying’ the policy. And those are specifically things that everyone in the community does, and has done, for years. There are zillions of packages, projects, repos, websites and groups using the names and logo this way, as the old policy said they could. The new policy tells them all to stop.”
Long-time open source advocate Bruce Perens told the Register that Rust’s trademark policy “goes far awry of fair use which is legally permitted. Books on Rust will always have its name in their title, commercial products will be advertised as being written in Rust, being compatible with Rust, or compiling Rust. But the policy attempts to deny permission for these things. A proper trademark policy prevents others from representing that their product is Rust or is endorsed by the trademark holder of Rust. That’s really as much as you can ever enforce, so there’s no sense in a policy that asks for more.”
The Register also spoke to Ashley Williams, a former member of the Rust core team and the original executive director and founder of the Rust Foundation, who argued upheaval in Rust’s governance over the past year led to a team with less experience dealing with the Rust community. “I think a couple of very passionate people participated in the trademark working group and they didn’t involve a lot of people who have even basic experience interacting with the community. So really classic community behaviors ended up getting prohibited in that [draft] policy. And that’s really why everybody got upset. The policy ultimately said, ‘a thing that you do all the time as a way of contributing to the Rust community is now against our policy.'”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.