Tag: proposes
EU Proposes Criminalizing AI-Generated Child Sexual Abuse and Deepfakes
Back in May 2022, the Commission presented a separate piece of CSA-related draft legislation, aiming to establish a framework that could make it obligatory for digital services to use automated technologies to detect and report existing or new child sexual abuse material (CSAM) circulating on their platforms, and identify and report grooming activity targeting kids. The CSAM-scanning plan has proven to be highly controversial — and it continues to split lawmakers in the parliament and the Council, as well as kicking up suspicions over the Commission’s links with child safety tech lobbyists and raising other awkward questions for the EU’s executive, over a legally questionable foray into microtargeted ads to promote the proposal. The Commission’s decision to prioritize the targeting of digital messaging platforms to tackle CSA has attracted a lot of criticism that the bloc’s lawmakers are focusing in the wrong area for combatting a complex societal problem — which may have generated some pressure for it to come with follow-on proposals. (Not that the Commission is saying that, of course; it describes today’s package as “complementary” to its earlier CSAM-scanning proposal.) “Fast evolving technologies are creating new possibilities for child sexual abuse online, and raises challenges for law enforcement to investigate this extremely serious and wide spread crime,” said Ylva Johansson, commissioner for home affairs, in a statement. “A strong criminal law is essential and today we are taking a key step to ensure that we have effective legal tools to rescue children and bring perpetrators to justice. We are delivering on our commitments made in the EU Strategy for a more effective fight against Child sexual abuse presented in July 2020.”
The final shape of the proposals will be determined by the EU’s co-legislators in the Parliament and Council. “If/when there’s agreement on how to amend the current directive on combating CSA, it would enter into force 20 days after its publication in the Official Journal of the EU,” adds TechCrunch.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
EU Proposes Criminalizing AI-Generated Child Sexual Abuse and Deepfakes
Back in May 2022, the Commission presented a separate piece of CSA-related draft legislation, aiming to establish a framework that could make it obligatory for digital services to use automated technologies to detect and report existing or new child sexual abuse material (CSAM) circulating on their platforms, and identify and report grooming activity targeting kids. The CSAM-scanning plan has proven to be highly controversial — and it continues to split lawmakers in the parliament and the Council, as well as kicking up suspicions over the Commission’s links with child safety tech lobbyists and raising other awkward questions for the EU’s executive, over a legally questionable foray into microtargeted ads to promote the proposal. The Commission’s decision to prioritize the targeting of digital messaging platforms to tackle CSA has attracted a lot of criticism that the bloc’s lawmakers are focusing in the wrong area for combatting a complex societal problem — which may have generated some pressure for it to come with follow-on proposals. (Not that the Commission is saying that, of course; it describes today’s package as “complementary” to its earlier CSAM-scanning proposal.) “Fast evolving technologies are creating new possibilities for child sexual abuse online, and raises challenges for law enforcement to investigate this extremely serious and wide spread crime,” said Ylva Johansson, commissioner for home affairs, in a statement. “A strong criminal law is essential and today we are taking a key step to ensure that we have effective legal tools to rescue children and bring perpetrators to justice. We are delivering on our commitments made in the EU Strategy for a more effective fight against Child sexual abuse presented in July 2020.”
The final shape of the proposals will be determined by the EU’s co-legislators in the Parliament and Council. “If/when there’s agreement on how to amend the current directive on combating CSA, it would enter into force 20 days after its publication in the Official Journal of the EU,” adds TechCrunch.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Tory peer proposes Online Safety Bill change to tackle online sexist abuse
White House Proposes 30% Tax On Electricity Used For Crypto Mining
Crypto mining has “negative spillovers on the environment,” the White House continued, and the pollution it generates “falls disproportionately on low-income neighborhoods and communities of color.” It added that the operations’ “often volatile power consumption ” can raise electricity prices for the people around them and cause service interruptions. Further, local power companies are taking a risk if they decide to upgrade their equipment to make their service more stable, since miners can easily move away to another location, even abroad. As Yahoo News noted, there are other industries, such as steel manufacturing, that also use large amounts of electricity but aren’t taxed for their energy consumption. In its post, the administration said that cryptomining “does not generate the local and national economic benefits typically associated with businesses using similar amounts of electricity.”
Critics believe that the government made this proposal to go after and harm an industry it doesn’t support. A Forbes report also suggested that DAME may not be the best solution for the issue, and that taxing the industry’s greenhouse gas emissions might be a better alternative. That could encourage mining firms not just to minimize energy use, but also to find cleaner sources of power. It might be difficult to convince the administration to go down that route, though: In its blog post, it said that the “environmental impacts of cryptomining exist even when miners use existing clean power.” Apparently, mining operations in communities with hydropower have been observed to reduce the amount of clean power available for use by others. That leads to higher prices and to even higher consumption of electricity from non-clean sources. “If the proposal ever becomes a law, the government would impose the excise tax in phases,” adds Engadget. “It would start by adding a 10 percent tax on miners’ electricity use in the first year, 20 percent in the second and then 30 percent from the third year onwards.”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
New York State AG proposes broad regulations for the cryptocurrency industry
New York State may soon have its own legislation to prevent crypto scandals on par with FTX’s downfall. Attorney General Letitia James has proposed a law, the CRPTO Act (Crypto Regulation, Protection, Transparency and Oversight), that’s meant to thwart cryptocurrency fraud and protect investors. Whether or not it’s the “strongest and most comprehensive” set of crypto regulations that James touts, it would theoretically prevent repeats of some high-profile incidents.
The CRPTO Act would bar conflicts of interest, such as owning multiple practices or marketplaces that trade for their own accounts. Companies would have to publicly report financial statements, including risk disclosures. There would be a host of investor safeguards, such as “know-your-customer” requirements, compensation for fraud victims and a ban on stablecoins (crypto coins whose value is tied to a safe asset) that aren’t pegged directly to US currency or “high-quality” liquid assets.
The bill would let the Attorney General’s office shut down lawbreakers and fine $10,000 per violation for individuals, and $100,000 per violation for companies. The office would also have the power to issue subpoenas and demand damages, penalties and restitution. The Department of Financial Services, meanwhile, would be ensured authority to license various crypto service providers.
James pointed to multiple real-world examples of alleged abuse the CRPTO act would potentially stop. Terraform Labs, for instance, promised a very high 20 percent interest rate to investors in one token on its marketplace if they bought the company’s other token, supposedly hiding the assets’ real value. Celsius, meanwhile, bought up its own token and created an artificial appearance of demand. That left investors “caught by surprise” when Celsius declared bankruptcy, according to the Attorney General.
The federal government is already cracking down on crypto fraud. The Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) believe existing rules already cover numerous crypto-related activities, and in some cases have jockeyed to claim primary responsibility for regulating the technology. Politicians in the House and Senate are pushing for nationwide regulations. New York’s efforts go one step further by tackling crypto-specific problems, though, and the state’s role as a financial hub may effectively let it dictate policies guiding firms across the US.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/new-york-state-ag-proposes-broad-regulations-for-the-cryptocurrency-industry-162228624.html?src=rss
FTC Proposes Barring Meta From Monetizing Kids’ Data
As a result, the FTC is proposing to strengthen the terms of the 2020 agreement to put additional restrictions on the company, which would apply to all of Meta’s services including Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Oculus. The proposed terms include a blanket ban on monetizing data from users under 18. That means any data collected from these users could only be used for security reasons and any data collected while users are under age could not be later monetized once they turn 18. The FTC also seeks to impose a pause on the company’s ability to launch new or modified products or services until the independent assessor confirms in writing that Meta’s privacy program is in full compliance with the terms of the agreement. Compliance with the 2020 order would also extend to any companies Meta acquires or merges with. The proposal would also require Meta to get affirmative consent from users for future use of facial recognition technology.
Facebook spokesperson Andy Stone called the FTC’s move a “political stunt.” He said in a statement: “Despite three years of continual engagement with the FTC around our agreement, they provided no opportunity to discuss this new, totally unprecedented theory. We have spent vast resources building and implementing an industry-leading privacy program under the terms of our FTC agreement. We will vigorously fight this action and expect to prevail.”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.