Tag: spite
In spite of recent a downward trend, the future remains bright for cloud
It would be easy to think the best days of the public cloud are over, but the data suggests otherwise, and there’s lots of room for growth.
In spite of recent a downward trend, the future remains bright for cloud by Ron Miller originally published on TechCrunch
Twitter gives dril a spite checkmark
The latest speed bump in the rollout of Twitter’s revamped verification policy under new owner Elon Musk is here: Spite checkmarks. Twitter is capriciously awarding unwanted blue verification badges to the most prominent critics of those very badges.
One recipient is the undisputed king of Weird Twitter, @dril (the massively popular account belonging to a writer in Los Angeles named Paul Dochney).
Another recipient of an unwanted badge is Mashable’s own Matt Binder.
Leftist Twitch streamer Hasan Piker is another recipient of an apparent spite checkmark.
It’s a puzzling twist in an absolutely exhausting story. Verification badges or “blue checks” started out dryly enough as the icons used in Twitter’s ID verification process, but in time they turned into status symbols. This divide between haves and have-nots became a pet issue for a certain subset of users — often critics of the perceived groupthink of Silicon Valley and the mainstream media — and when Elon Musk bought Twitter, one of his stated goals was to fix this divide by awarding the badges to those who subscribe to Twitter Blue, the paid version of Twitter created not long before Musk bought the company.
In practice, however, this transition was a mess. Musk himself touted the policy with tweets that antagonized his critics, and made him sound entitled to their money. “Trash me all day, but it’ll cost $8,” he wrote in November of last year. In the months after Twitter put this idea into practice, Twitter Blue subscribers were found to mostly be accounts with relatively few followers, and decidedly not the type of prominent users who need an ID verification process in order to avoid being impersonated, and having their followers potentially victimized.
But when Twitter took the added step of revoking the badges of prominent Twitter users earlier this week, a much sharper contrast appeared between Twitter Blue subscribers with their blue badges, and prominent, formerly verified users — perceived to be creators of much of the high-quality content that makes Twitter worthwhile — with none.
Making this state of affairs all the more aggravating for many longtime users was the fact that Twitter Blue membership is now associated with Elon Musk fandom. And since Twitter Blue subscribers get boosts in prominence on the site, blue checkmarks came to feel like a swarm of pests interfering with their enjoyment of the platform.
In response, the creator of a defunct app called The Block List, created an account called @BlockTheBlue, and started a campaign aimed at marginalizing Twitter Blue subscribers by blocking them en masse, thus ostensibly quieting the noise and returning Twitter to its previous idyll. The campaign might itself have remained marginal, but it quickly acquired @dril as a prominent proponent, and gave the Block the Blue campaign instant access to his 1.7 million followers.
Shortly after the Friday publication of a Mashable article about the campaign, the @BlockTheBlue account was suspended. Then on Saturday afternoon, @dril tweeted a picture of a toilet with a checkmark in it and used the hashtag #BlockTheBlueChecks.
Amid the drama surrounding that tweet, @dril suddenly had a blue checkmark next to his name. He responded by repeatedly changing his display name, and, naturally, joking around.
Mashable’s Matt Binder tweeted that he “will without a doubt be using whatever method works to get rid” of his checkmark.
Elon Musk has given out other seemingly involuntary blue checkmarks, including ones to Lebron James, Stephen King, and William Shatner. However this latest move is a slight change from this strategy. James, King, and Shatner had voiced their disapproval of the new policy, and Musk commented on their unexpected badges as if they were gifts.
By contrast, this latest crop of spite checkmarks is an unambiguous attempt to antagonize people who overtly criticize Musk and people who pay for Twitter. @dril, for his part, referred to them as “blue guys” and called them “dead-eyed cretins who are usually trying to sell you something stupid and expensive,” but now he is one. By his own logic, his followers should block him.
Binder called the move Musk’s “first funny thing.”
Update: As of 5:32 p.m. on April 22, this is story was still developing. Users appear to have suggested to @dril that this move on the part of Twitter may qualify as “false endorsement” which would be against the law. @drill appears to be continuously changing his name to remove the check mark, but it keeps being added to his profile anyway.
In addition, Kara Swisher, another prominent Musk critic, but one who doesn’t appear to be associated with the Block the Blue campaign was also a recipient of one of these unwanted checkmarks late on Saturday.
Pokémon Scarlet and Violet sell 10M copies in spite of performance complaints
Nintendo said it’s the ‘highest global sales level’ on any of the company’s consoles in the first three days since launch
Twitter’s Head of Safety says election integrity is ‘top priority’ in spite of layoffs
Twitter’s top safety executive says election integrity is a “top priority” for the company even as the company has shed half of its staff in the last 24 hours. Yoel Roth, Twitter’s head of safety and one of the company leaders to survive mass layoffs, took to Twitter to downplay moderation concerns raised by activists and advertisers in recent days.
“Yesterday’s reduction in force affected approximately 15% of our Trust & Safety organization (as opposed to approximately 50% cuts company-wide), with our front-line moderation staff experiencing the least impact,” Roth tweeted. “With early voting underway in the US, our efforts on election integrity — including harmful misinformation that can suppress the vote and combatting state-backed information operations — remain a top priority.”
Roth’s comments come hours after the NAACP joined a coalition of activists and civil rights organizations to call for advertisers to suspend spending with Twitter. While Musk met with civil rights leaders earlier this week, those calling for a boycott said the company’s deep staff cuts undermined his promise to maintain Twitter’s election protection policies and its hate speech rules.
More than 80% of our incoming content moderation volume was completely unaffected by this access change. The daily volume of moderation actions we take stayed steady through this period. pic.twitter.com/rSGKtq0e3J
— Yoel Roth (@yoyoel) November 4, 2022
Roth, who is so far the only Twitter executive besides Musk to publicly weigh in on the company’s policies following Musk’s takeover, also tried to address reports about the impact staff cuts would have on safety.
“Last week, for security reasons, we restricted access to our internal tools for some users, including some members of my team,” he said. “Most of the 2,000+ content moderators working on front-line review were not impacted, and access will be fully restored in the coming days.” But while much of Roth’s Trust and Safety team may have been spared, numerous other teams whose work touches on safety issues were not.
As NBC News reported, Twitter’s curation team, which worked to counter misinformation on the platform, was axed entirely. Many engineering roles that deal with safety issues were also cut, as were numerous workers in policy and communications.
Again, to be crystal clear, Twitter’s strong commitment to content moderation remains absolutely unchanged.
In fact, we have actually seen hateful speech at times this week decline *below* our prior norms, contrary to what you may read in the press.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 4, 2022
On Friday, Musk said that the layoffs were necessary. “Regarding Twitter’s reduction in force, unfortunately there is no choice when the company is losing over $4M/day,” he tweeted, adding that employees were offered three months of severance. “Again, to be crystal clear, Twitter’s strong commitment to content moderation remains absolutely unchanged.”