That draft paper Avi Loeb and AARO Director Sean Kirkpatrick co-authored is attracting lots of interpretations. They maintain that probes from a “mother ship” would be expected to adhere to “known physics” rather than demonstrating some talents listed in the “Five Observables” popularly quoted. Zamone Perez provides some larger background and context to the paper. Forbes contributor Eric Mack frames the problem nicely as Some UAP Sightings Don’t Fit Current Physics, Pentagon And Harvard Experts Say. The U.S. excitement is sending more than ripples across the Pond, per Oxford Mail’s Miranda Norris. She reports a UK Increase in UFO Sightings as ‘Military Starts to Take Them Seriously’. Wrapping up that draft paper and this whole larger context, Mike Cifone offers Loebism: Conjectures and Refutations. Cifone’s argumentation is well done, as is his suggestion that perhaps “most scientists, even the savants, have a very unsubtle (and idealistic) grasp of real history of science, let alone the philosophy that both guides and underwrites it.” (WM)
— Delivered by Feed43 service