Tag: policies
350+ American songwriters and managers support Copyright Office proposal regarding MLC’s policies for US streaming royalties
New YouTube policies demonetize more gaming content
Apple’s new App Store policies add more price points, going all the way up to $10,000
Just days ago, Elon Musk took aim at Apple’s App Store policies while dragging it into the political and culture war crosshairs, highlighting how important the storefront is to so many developers and services. Today, Apple announced it’s changing long-standing App Store policies that put tight restrictions on what developers are allowed to charge their customers, following up on a pledge made last year while settling a class-action lawsuit.
At the time, developers were restricted to fewer than 100 possible price points in the App Store, which Bloomberg reports previously started at a minimum of 49 cents for subscriptions and 99 cents for apps, with a max price of $999.99.
Securing Kubernetes Cluster Traffic With Pod Network Policies
Kubernetes Pods can freely communicate with each other by default. This poses a security risk when your cluster’s used for multiple applications or teams. Errant behavior or malicious access in one Pod could direct traffic to the other Pods in your cluster.
Read This Article on How-To Geek ›
Zuckerberg Says Apple’s Policies Not ‘Sustainable’
Zuckerberg also noted that Apple’s policies differ from other tech giants, including Microsoft and Google, which allow apps to be sideloaded onto devices if they’re inaccessible in app stores. “I do think Apple has sort of singled themselves out as the only company that is trying to control, unilaterally, what apps get on the device and I don’t think that’s a sustainable or a good place to be.” Changes to Apple’s app tracking policies last year are expected to cost Meta billions of dollars in lost ad revenue.
Zuckerberg’s comments come days after Musk publicly attacked Apple, alleging the company’s app store policies are an abuse of power. Asked about Musk’s content moderation decisions, Zuckerberg didn’t go as far as to endorse his strategy, but said, “I kind of think the world in the industry gets more interesting when people take some different approaches.” “[Y[ou can agree or disagree with what Elon is doing, or how he’s doing it. But I do think it’s going to be very interesting to see how this plays out in terms of the approaches he’s taking.” When asked about TikTok, Zuckerberg said it raises “a very complex set of questions” about the involvement of the Chinese state with TikTok’s affairs. “I’m sure it’s complicated.”
Further reading: Mark Zuckerberg Still ‘Long-Term Optimistic’ on Metaverse, Says Skepticism Doesn’t Bother Him Too Much
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
5 Policies To Implement That Reduce Your Company’s Carbon Footprint
Anthony Chadwick, Founder and CVO at Alpha Vet International explores.. I was at COP26 last November and was hopeful…
The post 5 Policies To Implement That Reduce Your Company’s Carbon Footprint appeared first on TechRound.
Twitch hopes its rewritten community policies are easier to understand
Twitch is continuing its ongoing safety reforms with a simple but potentially useful move: writing its policies in plain language. The company has rewritten its Community Guidelines to provide what it believes is a clearer structure with simpler wording, more context and practical examples. This includes new top-level categories (such as “Civility & Respect” and “Sensitive Content”) and more logical category groupings, such as a “Youth Safety” section that covers everything related to users under 18. Some violations now have dedicated categories, such as “Sexual Harassment” and “Prohibited Games.”
The livestreaming service emphasizes that the guidelines themselves haven’t changed. This is an effort to make the rules more usable. In theory, at least, you’ll see fewer inadvertent violations and more people reporting misbehavior. Twitch pointed to past revisions as an example of what could happen. When it enacted clearer rules for hate and harassment at the start of 2021, it saw both a 920 percent year-over-year surge in enforcement as well as a 511 percent jump in valid user reports.
The rewrite is an acknowledgment that Twitch’s lack of clarity has sometimes led to very real problems for creators. The service added a “Hot Tubs” category last year in part because its previous approach (lumping these streamers into the “Just Chatting” section) led to ambiguity for both users and advertisers concerned broadcasters were flouting the rules. Twitch also revised the language for its sexual content policy, and in June streamlined its approach to mentions of self-harm.
Twitch says it will continue refining the policies themselves, including a “more comprehensive” revision of its sexual content material. The clarification isn’t going to satisfy users concerned about the effectiveness of the guidelines. It may result in fewer accusations of unfair bans and demonetization, though, and might make it easier for Twitch to expand policies over time.
Google fined $161.9 million in India over ‘anti-competitive’ Android policies
Google is facing another fine for allegedly misusing its control of Android to suppress competition. CNETreports India’s Competition Commission has fined Google the equivalent of $161.9 million for supposedly giving its Android apps an edge using restrictive terms. The company imposes an “unfair condition” on phone makers by requiring that they preinstall Google apps as part of agreements, according to officials. That, in turn, is said to discourage companies from developing heavily modified Android variants that rely less on Google services.
The Commission also maintains that Google is wielding its “dominant position” to squeeze out competitors in search, app stores, web browsers and video services. Historically, Google has required that phones with the Play Store installed also include apps like Chrome and YouTube, often with prominent placement on the home screen. While you can always install alternatives like Firefox and Vimeo, they’re not included out of the box. Brands can use the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) if they want more flexibility, but they lose access to the Play Store in the process.
The regulator has issued a cease and desist order barring Google from requiring a “bouquet” of preinstalled apps. Companies have to be given the choice of which apps they want. Google also isn’t allowed to deny access to the Play Services framework, to include “anti-fragmentation” clauses that bar Android forks, or to offer incentives in return for exclusive search deals. Third-party app stores must be allowed to distribute through the Play Store. Users, meanwhile, must have the power to choose their search engine on setup and to uninstall Google apps they don’t want.
Google has declined to comment until it receives the official Commission order. The investigation began in 2019, but didn’t determine that Google had abused its dominance until September 2021.
The fine is tiny for Google, which made about $257.6 billion in worldwide revenue last year. The order could force it to significantly alter its deals with Android manufacturers, however, and comes after South Korea, the European Union and others have demanded similar changes. And Google can’t afford to ignore India — it’s the second-largest smartphone market on Earth with about 606.6 million users. A forced withdrawal would significantly damage Google’s bottom line, not to mention clout in the mobile industry.