Bigfoot Photographed in Washington State? – Coast to Coast
— Delivered by Feed43 service
Computers Tech Games Crypto Music and More
— Delivered by Feed43 service
Bigfoot sighting reports along the Lewis River around Mount Adams, Mount St Helens, and a few reports in the Olympic Forest. Here are a couple of photos that were posted to the media sites this past year.
This photo above was reportedly taken in the Olympic Forest of Washington. The foliage appears to be correct for this part of the Pacific Northwest.
The remainder of the photos in the video were captured in Washington state at various locations:
HAVE A COMMENT? GO TO OUR SUBREDDIT AND POST YOUR THOUGHTS
—–
—–
Have you had a sighting of a winged humanoid or huge bat-like creature in the Chicago, Illinois metro area / Lake Michigan region? The entity has also been referred to as the ‘Chicago Mothman’, ‘Chicago Owlman’ & ‘O’Hare Mothman’ or ‘O’Hare Batman.’ – Chicago / Lake Michigan Winged Humanoid Regional Interactive Map – Please feel free to contact me at lonstrickler@phantomsandmonsters.com – your anonymity is guaranteed. Our investigative group is conducting a serious examination of his phenomenon. We are merely seeking the truth and wish to determine what eyewitnesses have been encountering. Your cooperation is truly appreciated.
—–
TODAY’S TOP LINKS
2022 – A Very Active Year for Significant UFOs/UAPs and Ground Level Balls of Light, Bigfoot, and Cryptid Encounters Reported In Pennsylvania
Gigantic 15-foot Burmese python filmed crossing a road in Florida
PHANTOMS & MONSTERS RADIO Podcasts on Anchor
PHANTOMS & MONSTERS RADIO Podcasts on Spotify
**********
Please Consider a Donation to ‘Phantoms & Monsters’
Your financial support of Phantoms & Monsters and our other pursuits is much appreciated. This all depends on you, the readers & followers.
Please use the PayPal donation buttons on the blog site. You can also go directly to Phantoms & Monsters donation. Thanks again for your loyalty and continued support. Lon
This blog and newsletter are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Work 3.0 United States License.
Registered trademark PHANTOMS AND MONSTERS ® / PHANTOMS & MONSTERS ® – USPTO #90902480 – Lon D. Strickler
© 2005-2022 Phantoms & Monsters – All Rights Reserved
— Delivered by Feed43 service
— Delivered by Feed43 service
Two men were arrested on New Year’s Eve for allegedly shutting down four Washington state power substations in late December that led to power outages for thousands across Pierce County. Matthew Greenwood and Jeremy Crahan have been charged with conspiracy to damage energy facilities and Greenwood faces a separate charge of possessing illegal short-barreled rifles…. The two cut off power to thousands of locals and caused at least $3 million worth of damage, according to charging documents.
Investigators identified Greenwood and Crahan almost immediately after the attacks took place by using cell phone data that allegedly showed both men in the vicinity of all four substations, according to court documents. Surveillance images cited in the court documents also showed images of one of the men and of the getaway car….
The two face up to 20 years behind bars if convicted of conspiring to attack energy facilities.
In addition, possession of an unregistered firearm is punishable by up to ten years in prison, according to a statement from the Department of Justice. But identifying the suspects was apparently pretty simple.
“When law enforcement served a search warrant on the home of the suspects, they recovered distinctive clothing pictured in the surveillance photos.”
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader schwit1 for sharing the story.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Google has to pay out big after it settled a lawsuit for allegedly “deceiving users and invading their privacy” in Washington, D.C.
Washington DC Attorney General Karl Racine — who also recently won a settlement against Grubhub — accused Google of violating the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act and employing “dark patterns,” or design choices that are meant to trick users into doing things that don’t benefit them, like turning on location tracking.
Google has agreed to a settlement payout of $9.5 million and to change its practices regarding how it tells users about collecting, storing, and using their location data. Through it all, Google still denies any wrongdoing, according to the DCist. The site also agreed to create a compliance report every year for the next four years to prove that it is abiding by the terms of the settlement.
The complaint, which Racine filed in January 2022, alleged that Google led customers to believe they’re in control of whether or not the platform collects and keeps their location data, but that isn’t the case; instead, consumers “cannot prevent Google from collecting, storing, and profiting from their location,” the complaint read, according to Engadget.
“We sued because Google made it nearly impossible for users to stop their location from being tracked,” Racine tweeted after the settlement was reached. “Now, thanks to this settlement, Google must also make clear to consumers how their location data is collected, stored, and used.”
In a blog post from November, Google wrote that the “settlement is another step along the path of giving more meaningful choices and minimizing data collection while providing more helpful services.”
Do you ever order food online and realize what you thought would be a $12 chicken sandwich is actually more like a $50 chicken sandwich?
That’s exactly what happened to a bunch of D.C.-area Grubhub customers. The food delivery company has been ordered to pay a whopping $3.5 million after it was found violating the District of Columbia’s Consumer Protection and Procedures Act.
“Grubhub misled District residents and took advantage of local restaurants to boost its own profits, even as District consumers and small businesses struggled during the COVID-19 pandemic,” D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine said in a statement when he first sued Grubhub in March. “Grubhub charged hidden fees and used bait-and-switch advertising tactics — which are illegal. On top of that, the company deceived users with a promotion that claimed to support local restaurants during the heart of the pandemic. But in reality, this program cut into struggling restaurants’ profit margins while padding Grubhub’s bottom line.”
The AG’s complaint alleged that Grubhub imposed hidden fees on users and listed items at higher costs than the restaurants’ very own menus did, the DCist reported.
Customers in the area will collectively receive $2.7 million of the settlement directly, which Racine told ABC News will be given in “a refundable credit and if the credit is not used within 90 days the money will be sent to customers in the form of a check.” The company will also have to detail each fee associated with its service at checkout.
Grubhub did not immediately respond to Mashable’s request for comment, but in a statement to ABC News said that settling was in “the best interest of our business” and that the issue is now “resolved.” The company added that it is “committed to supporting all restaurants and diners, and is taking a number of steps to ensure price transparency.”
Grubhub has been ordered to pay $3.5 million to settle the lawsuit filed against the company by the District of Columbia over “deceptive trade practices.” Washington DC Attorney General Karl Racine has announced that his office has reached an agreement with the food delivery service “for charging customers hidden fees and using deceptive marketing techniques.” If you’ll recall, his office sued the company earlier this year, accusing it of charging hidden fees and misrepresenting Grubhub+ subscription’s offer of “unlimited free delivery,” since customers still have to pay a service fee.
The DC Attorney General’s office also accused the company of listing 1,000 restaurants in the area without their permission by using numbers that route to Grubhub workers or creating websites without the eateries’ consent. A previous TechCrunch report said the company had already ended those practices. Racine also said at the time that Grubhub ran a promotion called “Supper for Support” at the beginning of the pandemic and then “stuck restaurants with the bill” that cut into their profit margins.
Grubhub called the lawsuit frivolous at the time of its filing and said that the company was “disappointed [the AG’s office has] moved forward with [it] because [the service’s] practices have always complied with DC law, and in any event, many of the practices at issue have been discontinued.”
Under the terms of the settlement, Grubhub will pay affected customers in the DC area a total of $2.7 million. Their cut will be credited to their accounts, and it will be sent to them as a check if it remains unused within 90 days. In addition, the company has to pay $800,000 in civil penalties to the District of Columbia and has to clearly mark additional fees people have to pay with their order going forward.
My office reached a $3.5 million settlement with Grubhub for charging customers hidden fees and using deceptive marketing techniques.
As a result, $2.7 million will be returned to the consumers who were impacted, and it will have to shape up and disclose every fee separately.
— AG Karl A. Racine (@AGKarlRacine) December 30, 2022