With the Pentagon’s latest Congressional report on UFOs/UAPs due today, its treatment seems scarce in both mainstream and UFO-interested circles. ABC’s Luis Martinez has an October 28th article (hence the “Next Week” in the title) that’s a shade less brutal to UFO advocates than that offered by the New York Times’ Julian Barnes. How Stuff Works’ Allison Troutner touches upon a somewhat-related issue with Scientists Want You to Say ‘UAPs’, Not ‘UFOs’. Troutner’s article has some good points about the new NASA study, though its too brief “History of UFOs” leaves out the UAPTF that produced the June 25, 2021 report, not to mention AAWSAP and AATIP. Over at The Debrief, Avi Loeb offers a semi-autobiographical The NASA Study: A New Calculation on The Fly. Rather predictably, Loeb sees the answers to UAP not in the atmospheric envelope surrounding Earth, but through the agencies of astronomical mechanisms like The Galileo Project’s. And The Observer unearths a long-time discussion within ufology about possible government public preparation for Disclosure in Project Mindshift. We may learn whether the “Mindshift Hypothesis” is correct, but probably not today. (WM)
— Delivered by Feed43 service