With the deadline approaching for the Pentagon’s long awaited follow-on to the June 25, 2021 “Preliminary Assessment,” The New York Times’ Julian Barnes pens his usual skeptical-based article on the matter. Barnes tries to preview what the public can expect, which is basically “We’re on the job; we’ve explained a lot; most of what we’re finding is totally mundane but there are Bad Actors out there; we’re telling you what we can that won’t affect national security; we think we’d solve all the cases if we had enough information; forget UFO enthusiasts and their conspiracy theories — just move along and let us do our job.” John Greenewald attempts to calm the “ruckus” Barnes’ piece has caused about The Upcoming UAP Report, The NY Times, and Drones ‘n Trash. John’s pretty sure there will be a “public” as well as a classified report on October 31 or soon after. His reasoned and reasonable analysis of the current situation includes an overall “history repeating itself” theme in the Government’s approach to a still-mysterious conundrum. Along the way, John rather “bails out” Barnes as merely accurately reporting what Government representatives told him. After a bit under an hour, John takes questions, some of which pertain to the awaited report. And on another related subject, Billy Cox is saying that NASA’s Talking the Talk about its new data collection and evaluation project. Billy details some disturbing details behind his subheading “But Can its UAP Team Members Walk the Walk?” regarding the team’s promised open-mindedness and transparency. (WM)
— Delivered by Feed43 service